How is the Basel leverage ratio calculated and why was it introduced alongside risk-based capital requirements?
FRM II discusses the leverage ratio as a 'backstop' to risk-weighted capital. I understand it's simpler than risk-weighted ratios, but what exactly is included in the denominator, and how does it catch risks that RWA-based measures miss?
The Basel III leverage ratio is a simple, non-risk-weighted measure designed as a backstop to the risk-based capital framework. It was introduced because the 2008 financial crisis revealed that some banks had dangerously high leverage despite appearing well-capitalized on a risk-weighted basis.
The Formula:
Leverage Ratio = Tier 1 Capital / Total Exposure Measure
Minimum requirement: 3% (with additional buffers for G-SIBs)
Why Risk-Weighted Ratios Failed:
Before 2008, several banks had Tier 1 ratios above 10% (healthy-looking) but leverage ratios below 2% (dangerously thin). How? By concentrating in assets with low risk weights:
- AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities: 20% risk weight under the SA, or even lower under IRB
- Sovereign bonds: 0% risk weight
- Off-balance-sheet commitments: Low or zero conversion factors
When these 'low-risk' assets suffered unexpected losses, the banks had insufficient actual capital to absorb them because risk weights had dramatically underestimated the true risk.
Total Exposure Measure — What's in the Denominator:
- On-Balance-Sheet Exposures — All assets at their accounting value (no risk weighting), net of specific provisions and valuation adjustments. No netting of collateral (unlike RWA).
- Derivative Exposures — Replacement cost plus a measure of potential future exposure (PFE). Under Basel III, this uses the Standardized Approach for Counterparty Credit Risk (SA-CCR).
- Securities Financing Transactions (SFTs) — Repos, reverse repos, securities lending. Includes both the accounting asset and a measure of counterparty credit risk.
- Off-Balance-Sheet Items — Undrawn credit facilities, letters of credit, guarantees. Unlike RWA calculations, the leverage ratio uses higher (or no) credit conversion factors — a $1B undrawn credit line counts significantly in the exposure measure.
| Component | RWA Treatment | Leverage Ratio Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| AAA sovereign bonds | 0% risk weight | 100% of exposure |
| IG corporate loan | 50% risk weight | 100% of exposure |
| Undrawn credit facility | Low CCF | Higher CCF (often 100%) |
| Derivative netting | Recognized | Limited recognition |
G-SIB Leverage Buffer:
Global Systemically Important Banks face an additional leverage ratio buffer equal to 50% of their G-SIB risk-weighted surcharge. A G-SIB with a 2% RWA surcharge would need a leverage ratio of 3% + 1% = 4%.
Exam Tip: The FRM tests understanding of WHY the leverage ratio was introduced (catching model risk in risk weights) and the mechanics of the exposure measure (especially off-balance-sheet and derivative treatment).
Practice leverage ratio questions in our FRM Part II resources.
Master Part II with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.