What's the difference between a bond's maturity and its duration? Why does duration matter more for risk?
I'm studying fixed income for CFA Level I and I understand that maturity is simply when the bond's principal is repaid. But duration seems much more complicated. My textbook says duration measures 'interest rate sensitivity' but then also talks about Macaulay duration as a 'weighted average time to receive cash flows.' Are these the same thing? And why do portfolio managers care more about duration than maturity?
Unlock with Scholar — $19/month
Get full access to all Q&A answers, practice question explanations, and progress tracking.
No credit card required for free trial
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.