What does the Carhart 4-factor model add beyond Fama-French, and how does momentum factor work?
My CFA Level II materials mention the Carhart model which adds a momentum factor to Fama-French. What exactly is momentum in this context? How is WML constructed, and what does it tell us about a fund manager's true skill?
The Carhart (1997) 4-factor model extends Fama-French by adding a momentum factor (WML — Winners Minus Losers). It was originally developed to evaluate mutual fund performance.
The Model:
E(Ri) - Rf = bi_mkt x (Rm - Rf) + bi_smb x SMB + bi_hml x HML + bi_wml x WML
What Is the Momentum Factor?
Momentum is the empirical observation that stocks that performed well over the past 3-12 months tend to continue performing well, and losers tend to continue losing. This is one of the most robust anomalies in finance.
WML Construction:
- Winners: Top decile (or quartile) of stocks ranked by past 12-month return (skipping the most recent month to avoid microstructure effects)
- Losers: Bottom decile (or quartile)
- WML = Return of Winners portfolio minus Return of Losers portfolio
Historically, WML has averaged about 6-8% per year in US equity markets.
Why Add Momentum?
Carhart showed that many mutual funds with apparent alpha under the 3-factor model were actually just riding momentum. Once you control for WML, much of the 'skill' disappears.
Worked Example:
Harbor Point evaluates two fund managers:
Manager A — Eastgate Growth Fund:
| Factor | Loading | Premium | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | 1.05 | 6.0% | 6.30% |
| SMB | -0.20 | 2.5% | -0.50% |
| HML | -0.40 | 3.0% | -1.20% |
| WML | 0.55 | 7.0% | 3.85% |
| Expected excess return | 8.45% |
Actual excess return: 9.20%. Alpha = 9.20% - 8.45% = +0.75%
Manager B — Westfield Value Fund:
| Factor | Loading | Premium | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | 0.90 | 6.0% | 5.40% |
| SMB | 0.30 | 2.5% | 0.75% |
| HML | 0.65 | 3.0% | 1.95% |
| WML | -0.10 | 7.0% | -0.70% |
| Expected excess return | 7.40% |
Actual excess return: 8.60%. Alpha = 8.60% - 7.40% = +1.20%
Manager B shows higher true alpha despite lower raw returns because Manager A's performance was largely explained by momentum exposure (WML loading of 0.55).
Exam tip: CFA Level II often presents a fund's 3-factor alpha and asks whether adding momentum changes the conclusion about manager skill. A fund with high momentum loading and positive 3-factor alpha may have zero or negative 4-factor alpha — meaning the manager was just buying recent winners rather than demonstrating stock-picking ability.
Learn more about performance attribution models in our CFA Level II course on AcadiFi.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.