Why is posting bank activity a control risk if the bank statement already shows what happened?
Author: AcadiFi Team
- Related Article:
cpa-cash-controls-segregation-duties-audit-evidence - Related QB:
bank-reconciliation-review-control
Answer draft:
The bank statement shows cash movement, but it does not prove the accounting classification, business purpose, authorization, or completeness of the related records. A payment may clear the bank and still be unauthorized, recorded to the wrong vendor, posted to an expense instead of a receivable, or omitted from a suspense-clearing process.
That is why the reconciliation and review matter. A preparer can match the bank line to the general ledger. An independent reviewer should ask whether the payment was approved, whether the payee and bank account are valid, whether the entry belongs in the period, and whether unusual items were investigated. The CPA Exam often turns on that difference between matching and reviewing.
Master REG with our CPA Course
86 lessons · 160+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Which governmental funds use modified accrual accounting?
Why are capital asset purchases treated differently in governmental funds?
How do bond proceeds appear in governmental fund financial statements?
How do you distinguish special revenue, debt service, and capital projects funds?
When does a REG contract modification need new consideration?
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.