What is the difference between the premium leg and the protection leg of a CDS, and how do they determine the CDS spread?
I'm reviewing credit derivatives for FRM and I keep mixing up the two legs of a CDS. I know the buyer pays a spread and the seller pays out on default, but how exactly are the PVs of each leg calculated, and why does setting them equal give you the fair spread?
A credit default swap has two legs, and understanding both is essential for FRM Part I credit risk questions.
The Two Legs
Premium Leg (paid by the protection buyer):
The buyer makes periodic payments (usually quarterly) of a fixed spread s on the notional amount, conditional on the reference entity NOT having defaulted yet. The PV of the premium leg is:
PV_premium = s x N x SUM[ delta_i x DF_i x Q_i ]
Where:
- s = CDS spread (annualized)
- N = notional
- delta_i = accrual fraction for period i
- DF_i = risk-free discount factor to time i
- Q_i = survival probability to time i
Protection Leg (paid by the protection seller):
If the reference entity defaults, the seller pays (1 - Recovery) x Notional. The PV is computed over all possible default times:
PV_protection = (1 - R) x N x SUM[ DF_j x (Q_{j-1} - Q_j) ]
Where (Q_{j-1} - Q_j) represents the marginal default probability in period j.
Fair Spread Derivation
At initiation, the CDS has zero value, meaning:
PV_premium = PV_protection
Solving for s:
s = [(1 - R) x SUM(DF_j x (Q_{j-1} - Q_j))] / [SUM(delta_i x DF_i x Q_i)]
Numerical Example
Suppose Northfield Industries is the reference entity. Notional = $10M, recovery = 40%, and using a simplified 2-year framework with annual periods:
| Year | Survival Prob | Marginal Default Prob | Discount Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.97 | 0.03 | 0.9615 |
| 2 | 0.93 | 0.04 | 0.9246 |
PV_protection = 0.60 x [0.9615 x 0.03 + 0.9246 x 0.04] = 0.60 x [0.02885 + 0.03698] = 0.60 x 0.06583 = 0.03950
Risky annuity = 1.0 x 0.9615 x 0.97 + 1.0 x 0.9246 x 0.93 = 0.9327 + 0.8599 = 1.7926
Fair spread = 0.03950 / 1.7926 = 2.20% or 220 bps
Check our FRM question bank for more CDS pricing problems.
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.