How is credit unexpected loss calculated, and what is its relationship to economic capital?
I understand that expected loss = PD x LGD x EAD, but the unexpected loss concept is more confusing. How do you compute it for a single exposure, and how does it relate to the capital a bank must hold?
Unexpected loss (UL) measures the volatility of credit losses around the expected loss. While expected loss is a cost of doing business (priced into loan spreads and reserved for), unexpected loss is the uncertainty that requires capital.
Single Exposure Formula
UL = EAD x sqrt(PD x sigma_LGD^2 + LGD^2 x PD x (1 - PD))
where:
- PD = probability of default
- LGD = loss given default (mean)
- sigma_LGD = standard deviation of LGD
- EAD = exposure at default
The formula captures two sources of uncertainty: variability in LGD (first term) and variability in default itself (second term, a Bernoulli variance).
Worked Example
Ridgemont Bank has a $10 million commercial loan to a mid-market manufacturer.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| PD | 2.5% |
| LGD (mean) | 45% |
| sigma_LGD | 25% |
| EAD | $10,000,000 |
Expected Loss:
EL = 0.025 x 0.45 x $10M = $112,500
Unexpected Loss:
UL = $10M x sqrt(0.025 x 0.25^2 + 0.45^2 x 0.025 x 0.975)
UL = $10M x sqrt(0.025 x 0.0625 + 0.2025 x 0.024375)
UL = $10M x sqrt(0.001563 + 0.004936)
UL = $10M x sqrt(0.006499)
UL = $10M x 0.08062
UL = $806,200
Relationship to Economic Capital
Economic capital covers losses beyond expected loss up to a chosen confidence level (typically 99.9% for banks). The relationship is:
Economic Capital = Loss at 99.9% confidence - Expected Loss
For a portfolio, UL is not simply additive because default correlations matter. Correlated defaults increase portfolio-level unexpected loss. The capital multiplier (often 3-5x single-exposure UL for a diversified portfolio at 99.9%) bridges single-name UL to the capital requirement.
Key Exam Points:
- EL is a cost (reserved/provisioned); UL is a risk (capitalized)
- Higher LGD variability increases UL even if mean LGD stays the same
- Portfolio UL depends critically on default correlation — higher correlation = higher UL
- Basel IRB models use a specific correlation function that varies by PD
For more on credit risk capital, explore our FRM Part II question bank.
Master Part II with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.