Can someone explain the actual cash flow mechanics of a currency swap step by step?
I'm studying currency swaps for FRM Part I and I get confused by the fact that principals are exchanged (unlike a plain-vanilla IRS). When exactly do the principal exchanges happen, and how do you handle the fact that each leg is in a different currency? A concrete example would help a lot.
Currency swaps differ from plain-vanilla interest rate swaps in three crucial ways: (1) principals ARE exchanged at inception and maturity, (2) interest payments are in two different currencies, and (3) there is FX risk layered on top of interest rate risk.
The Three Phases
Setup: Pinnacle Bank needs EUR funding, and Evergreen Corp needs USD funding. The spot rate at inception is EUR/USD = 1.0870 (i.e., $1.087 per euro). They agree to a 3-year currency swap:
- Notional: $10 million vs. EUR 9.2 million (= 10M / 1.087)
- Pinnacle pays 3.50% on the EUR notional
- Evergreen pays 4.50% on the USD notional
Phase 1 — Initial Exchange (Day 0):
Pinnacle hands $10M to Evergreen. Evergreen hands EUR 9.2M to Pinnacle. Each party now has the foreign currency it needs.
Phase 2 — Annual Coupon Swaps (Years 1, 2, 3):
- Pinnacle pays Evergreen: EUR 9.2M x 3.50% = EUR 322,000
- Evergreen pays Pinnacle: $10M x 4.50% = $450,000
Note: these are NOT netted (unlike IRS in the same currency) because they are in different currencies.
Phase 3 — Final Exchange (Year 3):
Principals are re-exchanged at the ORIGINAL exchange rate, regardless of where spot FX is at maturity. Pinnacle returns EUR 9.2M; Evergreen returns $10M.
Valuation mid-life works exactly like an IRS — treat each leg as a bond in its respective currency, convert to a common currency at the current spot rate, then subtract.
This is heavily tested in FRM Part I, especially the distinction between currency swaps and cross-currency basis swaps.
Join our FRM community for more derivatives discussion.
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.