How does a digital (binary) option pay a fixed amount, and why does the discontinuous payoff create hedging challenges?
I'm reviewing binary options for FRM. The all-or-nothing payoff seems simple — either you get a fixed payout or nothing. But I've heard that hedging near the strike at expiration is extremely difficult. Why is the discontinuity such a problem, and how do dealers manage it?
A digital (binary) option pays a fixed predetermined amount if the underlying finishes beyond the strike, and zero otherwise. This discontinuous payoff creates extreme delta and gamma near the strike at expiration, making hedging a significant challenge.\n\nTypes of Binary Options:\n\n| Type | Payoff (Call) | Payoff (Put) |\n|---|---|---|\n| Cash-or-Nothing | Q if S_T > K, else 0 | Q if S_T < K, else 0 |\n| Asset-or-Nothing | S_T if S_T > K, else 0 | S_T if S_T < K, else 0 |\n\nwhere Q is the fixed cash amount.\n\nPricing (Cash-or-Nothing Call):\n\nV = Q x e^{-rT} x N(d2)\n\nwhere d2 is the same d2 from Black-Scholes-Merton:\n\nd2 = [ln(S/K) + (r - q - sigma^2/2) x T] / (sigma x sqrt(T))\n\nThe price equals the present value of Q times the risk-neutral probability of finishing in the money.\n\nWorked Example:\nCedarpoint Trading sells a 30-day cash-or-nothing call on Avalon Semiconductors. Parameters:\n- Spot: $148, Strike: $150, Payout: $10,000, r = 5%, q = 0%, sigma = 32%\n\nd2 = [ln(148/150) + (0.05 - 0 - 0.0512) x 30/365] / (0.32 x sqrt(30/365))\nd2 = [-0.01342 + (-0.0001) x 0.0822] / (0.32 x 0.2867)\nd2 = -0.01343 / 0.09174 = -0.1464\n\nN(-0.1464) = 0.4418\n\nPrice = $10,000 x e^{-0.05 x 0.0822} x 0.4418 = $10,000 x 0.9959 x 0.4418 = $4,400\n\nThe Hedging Nightmare Near Expiration:\n\nWith 1 day remaining and the stock at $149.90 (just below the $150 strike):\n- A $0.20 move up triggers a $10,000 payout\n- Delta approaches infinity at the strike as expiration nears\n- The dealer must buy/sell enormous quantities of stock to delta-hedge tiny price changes\n- Gamma is extremely negative (for the seller) near the strike\n\nPractical dealers address this by:\n1. Spread replication: Approximating the binary with a tight bull call spread (buy K-epsilon call, sell K+epsilon call, scale the notional)\n2. Vega hedging: The skew around the strike significantly affects the binary's value\n3. Pin risk management: Accepting that perfect hedging is impossible near the strike and managing position limits\n4. Wider bid-ask spreads near expiration to compensate for hedging difficulty\n\nBinary-Vanilla Relationship:\nA cash-or-nothing call is the derivative of a vanilla call with respect to the strike:\n\nBinary Call = -dC/dK (scaled by Q)\n\nThis mathematical relationship is useful for constructing replicating portfolios.\n\nPractice exotic option pricing in our FRM question bank.
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.