How do you calculate the fair value of an equity index future and identify when it trades rich or cheap?
My FRM study group has been arguing about whether S&P 500 futures are currently trading above or below fair value. I know the cost-of-carry model is the key, but I'm unsure how to properly account for the continuous dividend yield. Can someone demonstrate with a real-world style example?
The fair value of an equity index futures contract is determined by the cost-of-carry model, which balances the financing cost of holding the index against the dividends received.
Cost-of-Carry Formula (Continuous)
F = S x e^{(r - q) x T}
where:
- S = current spot index level
- r = risk-free rate (continuously compounded)
- q = continuous dividend yield
- T = time to expiry in years
Worked Example
The Grandview 500 index is currently at 5,280. The 3-month risk-free rate is 4.60% (continuously compounded), and the index has a continuous dividend yield of 1.45%. The futures contract expires in 63 trading days (roughly 91 calendar days).
T = 91 / 365 = 0.2493
F = 5,280 x e^{(0.046 - 0.0145) x 0.2493}
F = 5,280 x e^{0.00785}
F = 5,280 x 1.00788
F = 5,321.6
If the actual futures price is 5,340, the contract is trading 18.4 points rich to fair value.
Arbitrage Implications
| Futures vs Fair Value | Strategy | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Futures > Fair Value (rich) | Cash-and-carry | Buy index, sell futures, finance at r |
| Futures < Fair Value (cheap) | Reverse cash-and-carry | Sell index short, buy futures, invest proceeds |
Practical Frictions
In reality, transaction costs, margin requirements, short-selling constraints, and the discrete nature of dividends create a no-arbitrage band around fair value — typically 1-3 index points for major indices.
Exam Tip: If the question gives discrete dividends instead of a continuous yield, use F = (S - PV(Dividends)) x e^{r x T} instead.
Check out our FRM Part I question bank for more futures pricing problems.
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.