How do Eurodollar futures work mechanically, and how does a corporate treasurer use them to lock in a borrowing rate?
I'm studying FRM Part I and the futures section keeps referencing Eurodollar futures as one of the most heavily traded contracts historically. I understand they are tied to 3-month LIBOR (or now SOFR), but I get confused by the '100 minus rate' quoting convention and the cash-settlement mechanics. Can someone walk through a practical hedging example with actual numbers?
Eurodollar futures were among the most liquid interest rate derivatives ever created, and understanding their mechanics is foundational for FRM candidates. Even though LIBOR has transitioned to SOFR, the CME's 3-Month SOFR futures use the same quoting convention.
Quoting Convention
The futures price is quoted as 100 minus the annualized rate. If the quoted price is 95.25, that implies a rate of 4.75%. Each contract covers a notional of $1,000,000 for a 90-day period.
Tick Value
One basis point move = $1,000,000 x 0.0001 x (90/360) = $25 per contract per basis point.
Hedging Example
Pemberton Industries expects to borrow $50 million in 6 months at 3-month SOFR + 80 bps. The treasurer fears rates will rise and wants to lock in today's implied rate.
Current 3-Month SOFR futures (6-month expiry): quoted at 95.50, implying 4.50%.
Step 1 — Position sizing: $50,000,000 / $1,000,000 = 50 contracts.
Step 2 — Sell futures at 95.50 (the treasurer is a borrower, so she sells to hedge against rising rates).
Step 3 — At expiry, suppose 3-month SOFR has risen to 5.10%. The futures settle at 94.90.
Gain on hedge: (95.50 - 94.90) x 100 bps x $25 x 50 = 60 x $25 x 50 = $75,000.
Step 4 — Net borrowing cost: Pemberton borrows at 5.10% + 0.80% = 5.90% annualized on $50M for 90 days = $737,500. Subtracting the $75,000 futures gain gives an effective interest cost of $662,500, equivalent to roughly 5.30% all-in — close to the original 4.50% + 0.80% = 5.30% target.
Key Exam Points:
- Borrowers sell Eurodollar/SOFR futures; lenders buy them
- Cash settlement eliminates delivery risk
- Convexity bias means futures rates slightly overstate forward rates for long-dated contracts — this matters for swap pricing
For more practice with interest rate derivatives, explore our FRM Part I question bank.
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.