How do banks estimate exposure at default (EAD), especially for off-balance-sheet commitments?
For FRM Part II, I understand EAD for a term loan is just the outstanding balance. But what about revolving credit lines and other commitments where the borrower can draw more before defaulting? How do credit conversion factors work?
Exposure at Default (EAD) measures how much a bank stands to lose IF a borrower defaults. For funded exposures it's straightforward, but unfunded commitments are trickier because borrowers tend to draw down lines before defaulting.
Funded Exposures (Simple):
- Term loan with $10M outstanding: EAD = $10M
- Bond holding at par $5M: EAD = $5M
Unfunded Commitments (Complex):
For revolving credit facilities, EAD includes both the current drawn amount and expected additional drawdowns:
EAD = Drawn Amount + CCF x Undrawn Commitment
Where CCF (Credit Conversion Factor) estimates the fraction of the undrawn line the borrower will use before defaulting.
Example — Thornfield National Bank's revolving facility to Westbrook Industries:
- Committed line: $50M
- Currently drawn: $30M
- Undrawn: $20M
- Estimated CCF: 60%
EAD = $30M + 0.60 x $20M = $30M + $12M = $42M
Why CCF > 0:
Borrowers approaching distress often:
- Draw down remaining credit lines as other funding sources dry up
- Use facilities more aggressively to meet operational needs
- Attempt to access funds before the bank freezes the line
Empirical studies show CCFs of 40-75% for revolving facilities, higher for investment-grade borrowers (they have larger undrawn amounts).
Basel Approaches:
| Approach | EAD Method | CCF Source |
|---|---|---|
| Standardized | Fixed CCFs by product type | Regulatory (20%, 50%, 75%, 100%) |
| Foundation IRB | Fixed CCFs | Regulatory (75% for commitments) |
| Advanced IRB | Bank estimates own CCFs | Internal data + modeling |
Other Exposure Types:
- Derivatives: EAD = Current exposure + Add-on for potential future exposure (SA-CCR methodology)
- Repo/Securities lending: EAD = max(0, Exposure - Collateral) with haircuts
- Guarantees: EAD = guaranteed amount x CCF
FRM Key Points:
- CCF is NOT a constant — it varies by facility type, borrower quality, and economic conditions
- Distressed borrowers draw down faster, creating 'wrong-way risk' (higher EAD precisely when PD is high)
- EAD and LGD can be correlated — secured revolvers have lower LGD but potentially higher EAD (collateral drawdown)
- SA-CCR replaced CEM (Current Exposure Method) for derivative EAD under Basel III
Master EAD estimation in our FRM Part II Credit Risk module.
Master Part II with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.