Can someone explain the Fama-French 3-factor model with a worked example showing SMB and HML?
I understand the Fama-French model adds size (SMB) and value (HML) factors to the market factor, but I'm confused about what SMB and HML actually represent. How are they constructed, and how do I interpret a stock's loading on these factors?
The Fama-French 3-factor model is one of the most important asset pricing models in finance and a key topic for CFA Level II.
The Model:
E(Ri) - Rf = bi_mkt x (Rm - Rf) + bi_smb x SMB + bi_hml x HML
Where:
- (Rm - Rf) = Market risk premium (same as CAPM)
- SMB (Small Minus Big) = Return of small-cap stocks minus return of large-cap stocks
- HML (High Minus Low) = Return of high book-to-market (value) stocks minus low book-to-market (growth) stocks
How SMB and HML Are Constructed:
Fama and French sort all NYSE/AMEX/NASDAQ stocks into groups:
- Size sort: Split into Small and Big at the NYSE median market cap
- Value sort: Split into three groups based on book-to-market ratio (top 30% = High, middle 40% = Neutral, bottom 30% = Low)
This creates 6 portfolios (2 x 3). Then:
- SMB = average return of 3 small portfolios minus average return of 3 big portfolios
- HML = average return of 2 high B/M portfolios minus average return of 2 low B/M portfolios
Worked Example:
Stonegate Analytics runs a regression for Apex Manufacturing and finds:
| Factor | Factor Loading (b) | Risk Premium | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market (Rm - Rf) | 1.15 | 6.0% | 6.90% |
| SMB | 0.45 | 2.5% | 1.13% |
| HML | 0.70 | 3.0% | 2.10% |
Rf = 4.0%
E(R_Apex) = 4.0% + 6.90% + 1.13% + 2.10% = 14.13%
Interpreting the Loadings:
- SMB loading = 0.45 (positive): Apex behaves somewhat like a small-cap stock, earning a size premium
- HML loading = 0.70 (positive): Apex behaves like a value stock (high book-to-market), earning a value premium
- If HML loading were negative, the stock would behave like a growth stock
Contrast with CAPM:
Using CAPM alone: E(R) = 4.0% + 1.15 x 6.0% = 10.90%
Fama-French adds 3.23% from size and value factors. A fund manager who generates 12% return might appear to have 1.10% alpha under CAPM but only -2.13% under Fama-French — meaning the returns were fully explained by factor exposures, not skill.
Exam tip: The CFA Level II exam often tests whether apparent alpha disappears once you account for size and value exposures. Be prepared to calculate expected returns under both CAPM and Fama-French and compare the implied alphas.
Explore more factor models in our CFA Level II portfolio course on AcadiFi.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.