How do you calculate the settlement amount on a Forward Rate Agreement (FRA)?
I'm reviewing the money markets section for FRM Part I and I keep getting the FRA settlement formula wrong. I understand an FRA locks in a future borrowing rate, but the discounting at settlement confuses me. If I enter a 3×6 FRA at 4.25% and the reference rate at settlement is 4.80%, what do I actually receive? And why is it discounted?
FRA settlement is a classic FRM Part I topic that tests whether you understand present value mechanics in money markets. Here's the breakdown.
What an FRA Does
A Forward Rate Agreement is an OTC contract where two parties agree on an interest rate for a future period. The buyer (long) benefits when rates rise above the agreed rate; the seller benefits when rates fall below it.
Why Settlement Is Discounted
The FRA settles at the beginning of the reference period, not the end. Since the interest differential would normally be paid at the end of the period, you must discount it back to the settlement date. This is what distinguishes FRAs from simple rate locks.
Settlement Formula:
$$\text{Settlement} = \frac{N \times (R_{\text{ref}} - R_{\text{FRA}}) \times \frac{d}{360}}{1 + R_{\text{ref}} \times \frac{d}{360}}$$
Where:
- N = Notional principal
- R_ref = Reference rate at settlement (e.g., SOFR)
- R_FRA = Agreed FRA rate
- d = Days in the reference period
Worked Example:
You enter a 3×6 FRA (settles in 3 months, covers the period from month 3 to month 6).
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Notional (N) | $10,000,000 |
| FRA rate (R_FRA) | 4.25% |
| Reference rate at settlement (R_ref) | 4.80% |
| Days in reference period (d) | 91 |
Step 1 — Interest differential:
$10,000,000 × (0.0480 − 0.0425) × (91/360) = $10,000,000 × 0.0055 × 0.25278 = $13,903
Step 2 — Discount to settlement date:
Discount factor = 1 + 0.0480 × (91/360) = 1 + 0.01213 = 1.01213
Settlement = $13,903 / 1.01213 = $13,736
Since you're the buyer and rates rose above the FRA rate, you receive $13,736 at settlement.
Common Mistakes:
- Forgetting to discount — this overstates the settlement by the time-value difference.
- Using 365 instead of 360 — FRAs use an Actual/360 day count by convention.
- Confusing the sign — the buyer profits when rates rise, the seller profits when rates fall.
For more worked examples on money market instruments, explore our FRM Part I question bank on AcadiFi.
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.