What are the most important IFRS vs US GAAP differences tested at CFA Level II?
I keep encountering IFRS/GAAP differences throughout the FRA curriculum. Instead of memorizing each one individually, is there a comprehensive summary of the key differences that CFA Level II tests most frequently?
Here is a comprehensive summary of the most-tested IFRS vs US GAAP differences at CFA Level II, organized by topic.
Revenue Recognition:
| Topic | IFRS | US GAAP |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | IFRS 15 | ASC 606 |
| Framework | Largely converged | Largely converged |
| Key difference | Minor guidance differences | More detailed application guidance |
Inventory:
| Topic | IFRS | US GAAP |
|---|---|---|
| LIFO allowed? | No | Yes |
| Write-down basis | Lower of cost and NRV | Lower of cost or market |
| Write-down reversal | Yes (up to original cost) | No |
Long-Lived Assets:
| Topic | IFRS | US GAAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revaluation model | Allowed | Not allowed (cost model only) |
| Impairment test | One-step (CV vs recoverable amount) | Two-step (recoverability, then FV) |
| Impairment reversal | Yes (except goodwill) | No |
| Component depreciation | Required | Permitted but rare |
Leases:
| Topic | IFRS 16 | ASC 842 |
|---|---|---|
| Lessee model | Single model (all capitalized) | Dual model (finance vs operating) |
| Operating lease P&L (lessee) | Depreciation + Interest | Single straight-line expense |
Income Taxes:
| Topic | IFRS (IAS 12) | US GAAP (ASC 740) |
|---|---|---|
| DTA recognition | Recognized if "probable" (> 50%) | Recognize fully, then VA if "more likely than not" |
| Approach | No valuation allowance concept | Valuation allowance reduces gross DTA |
| Tax rate changes | Use enacted or substantively enacted rates | Use enacted rates only |
Pensions:
| Topic | IFRS (IAS 19R) | US GAAP (ASC 715) |
|---|---|---|
| Return assumption | Discount rate on net position | Expected return on plan assets |
| Actuarial gains/losses | OCI, never recycled | OCI, amortized via corridor |
| Past service cost | Immediate P&L | Amortized from OCI |
R&D:
| Topic | IFRS (IAS 38) | US GAAP |
|---|---|---|
| Research | Expense | Expense |
| Development | Capitalize if 6 criteria met | Expense (narrow software exception) |
Consolidation:
| Topic | IFRS | US GAAP |
|---|---|---|
| Goodwill | Full or partial goodwill choice | Full goodwill only |
| VIE equivalent | Power + benefits approach | Primary beneficiary (power + losses/benefits) |
The Key Analytical Implication:
Companies reporting under IFRS vs GAAP are not directly comparable without adjustments. IFRS companies tend to have:
- Higher reported assets (revaluation, capitalized development)
- More balance sheet volatility (impairment reversals)
- Different pension expense composition
- Different lease expense patterns
Exam Tip: The CFA exam often presents a scenario where two companies use different standards and asks how the reported ratios would differ or what adjustments are needed for comparison.
Explore our CFA Level II FRA course for detailed IFRS/GAAP comparison materials.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.