How do you calculate the justified P/E ratio from the Gordon Growth Model, and when would you use trailing vs. leading P/E?
CFA Level II equity valuation question. I know P/E is price divided by EPS, but the curriculum talks about a 'justified' P/E derived from fundamentals. How does this differ from just looking at a stock's market P/E, and when should I use trailing versus leading versions?
The justified P/E is one of the most elegant connections in CFA equity valuation -- it links the price multiple directly to the company's fundamentals rather than just observing what the market happens to be paying.
Derivation from the Gordon Growth Model
Start with: P0 = D1 / (r - g)
Since D1 = E1 x (1 - b), where b is the retention ratio:
P0 = E1 x (1 - b) / (r - g)
Leading (Forward) Justified P/E:
P0 / E1 = (1 - b) / (r - g)
Trailing Justified P/E:
Since E1 = E0 x (1 + g):
P0 / E0 = (1 - b)(1 + g) / (r - g)
Worked Example: Meridian Software Corp (fictional)
| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Payout ratio (1 - b) | 40% |
| Required return (r) | 11% |
| Sustainable growth (g) | 6% |
| Current EPS (E0) | $3.20 |
Leading justified P/E = 0.40 / (0.11 - 0.06) = 0.40 / 0.05 = 8.0x
Trailing justified P/E = 0.40 x 1.06 / (0.11 - 0.06) = 0.424 / 0.05 = 8.48x
Justified price = 8.0 x E1 = 8.0 x ($3.20 x 1.06) = 8.0 x $3.39 = $27.14
Or equivalently: 8.48 x $3.20 = $27.14 (same answer either way)
Trailing vs. Leading -- When to Use Each
| Scenario | Use | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Comparing to market consensus estimates | Leading P/E | Analysts report forward estimates |
| Company with volatile or cyclical earnings | Leading P/E | Historical EPS may be misleading |
| Stable mature company | Either works | Earnings are predictable |
| Comparing across sectors with different fiscal years | Leading P/E | Normalizes timing differences |
The Power of Justified P/E
If Meridian's actual market P/E is 12x but the justified P/E is only 8x, the stock appears overvalued -- the market is paying more than fundamentals warrant. Conversely, a market P/E of 6x against a justified 8x signals undervaluation.
Sensitivity Analysis: The justified P/E is extremely sensitive to the spread (r - g). If g increases from 6% to 7% while r stays at 11%, the leading P/E jumps from 8.0x to 10.0x -- a 25% increase from just a 1% change in growth. This is why small changes in growth assumptions can dramatically swing valuations.
For more on multiples-based valuation, explore our CFA Level II equity materials.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.