Why does a two-tailed test split alpha across both tails?
If the significance level is 5%, why do two-tailed tests use 2.5% in each tail instead of 5% on each side?
The significance level is the total probability of rejecting the null when it is true. In a two-tailed 5% test, unusual results in either direction count against the null, so the total 5% rejection probability is split across the two tails.
That means:
- 2.5% in the left tail.
- 2.5% in the right tail.
- 5.0% total rejection probability.
If you put 5% in each tail, the total rejection probability would be 10%, not 5%.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is my allocation effect NEGATIVE for a sector that had positive returns?
How do I identify the OPTIMAL sector decision in a Brinson attribution table?
What is the difference between Brinson-Hood-Beebower and Brinson-Fachler? Which is on the exam?
Why does the trust pay tax on income instead of the beneficiary?
How bad are the compressed trust tax brackets really? Show me the dollars.
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.