How do you calculate parametric VaR for a multi-asset portfolio using the correlation matrix?
I understand single-asset VaR but I'm getting tripped up on the portfolio version for FRM Part II. How do correlations between assets reduce (or increase) portfolio VaR compared to the sum of individual VaRs? Can someone show the matrix calculation step by step?
Portfolio parametric VaR is one of the most testable topics in FRM Part II Market Risk. The key insight is that diversification reduces VaR when correlations are less than 1.
Single-Asset VaR:
VaR = z_alpha x sigma x Portfolio_Value
Portfolio VaR (Matrix Approach):
VaR_p = z_alpha x sqrt(w' x Sigma x w) x Portfolio_Value
Where:
- w = vector of portfolio weights
- Sigma = covariance matrix
- z_alpha = confidence level z-score (2.326 for 99%)
Worked Example — Beacon Capital:
Beacon holds a $10M portfolio:
- Asset A (Equities): 60% weight, daily vol = 1.5%
- Asset B (Bonds): 25% weight, daily vol = 0.6%
- Asset C (Commodities): 15% weight, daily vol = 2.0%
Correlation matrix:
| A | B | C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.00 | -0.20 | 0.35 |
| B | -0.20 | 1.00 | 0.10 |
| C | 0.35 | 0.10 | 1.00 |
Step 1: Individual VaRs (undiversified)
- VaR_A = 2.326 x 0.015 x $6M = $209,340
- VaR_B = 2.326 x 0.006 x $2.5M = $34,890
- VaR_C = 2.326 x 0.020 x $1.5M = $69,780
- Undiversified VaR = $314,010 (simple sum)
Step 2: Build the Covariance Matrix
Cov(i,j) = rho(i,j) x sigma_i x sigma_j
| A | B | C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.000225 | -0.000018 | 0.000105 |
| B | -0.000018 | 0.000036 | 0.000012 |
| C | 0.000105 | 0.000012 | 0.000400 |
Step 3: Portfolio Variance
sigma_p^2 = w' x Sigma x w
= 0.60^2 x 0.000225 + 0.25^2 x 0.000036 + 0.15^2 x 0.000400
+ 2 x 0.60 x 0.25 x (-0.000018)
+ 2 x 0.60 x 0.15 x 0.000105
+ 2 x 0.25 x 0.15 x 0.000012
= 0.0000810 + 0.0000023 + 0.0000090
+ (-0.0000054) + 0.0000189 + 0.0000009
= 0.0001067
sigma_p = sqrt(0.0001067) = 1.033%
Step 4: Diversified VaR
VaR_p = 2.326 x 0.01033 x $10M = $240,278
Diversification Benefit:
$314,010 - $240,278 = $73,732 (23.5% reduction)
The negative correlation between equities and bonds (-0.20) is the primary driver of this benefit.
Key Exam Points:
- Undiversified VaR is always >= Diversified VaR
- They're equal only when all correlations = 1
- Negative correlations provide the most diversification benefit
- The square root in the formula is why VaR doesn't scale linearly with portfolio size
Practice more VaR calculations in our FRM Part II question bank.
Master Part II with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.