P/E vs. EV/EBITDA: when should I use each multiple and what are the pitfalls?
I'm confused about relative valuation multiples in CFA Level II. Both P/E and EV/EBITDA are commonly used, but they seem to give different answers. When is one more appropriate than the other, and what adjustments should I make before comparing multiples across companies?
Relative valuation using price multiples is one of the most practical skills tested in CFA Level II. Understanding when to use P/E vs. EV/EBITDA — and their pitfalls — is essential.
P/E Ratio (Price-to-Earnings):
$$P/E = \frac{\text{Price per Share}}{\text{EPS}}$$
Measures what the market pays per dollar of earnings to equity holders.
EV/EBITDA (Enterprise Value to EBITDA):
$$EV/EBITDA = \frac{\text{Market Cap + Debt - Cash}}{\text{EBITDA}}$$
Measures what the market values the entire firm at per dollar of operating cash proxy.
Key Differences:
| Feature | P/E | EV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|
| Numerator | Equity value only | Total firm value |
| Denominator | After interest & tax | Before interest, tax, D&A |
| Capital structure effect | Affected by leverage | Largely neutral |
| Depreciation effect | Affected | Excluded |
| Negative earnings | Meaningless | Can still work |
| Tax regime differences | Distorted | Less distorted |
When to Use Each:
Use P/E when:
- Comparing companies with similar leverage
- Earnings are positive and stable
- Companies in the same tax jurisdiction
- Valuing mature, profitable businesses
Use EV/EBITDA when:
- Comparing companies with different capital structures
- Companies have different depreciation policies or asset ages
- Earnings are negative but EBITDA is positive
- Cross-border comparisons (different tax rates)
- Capital-intensive industries (telecom, utilities, manufacturing)
Worked Example: Comparing Two Retailers
| Metric | Ashwood Retail | Birchfield Stores |
|---|---|---|
| Share Price | $64 | $38 |
| EPS | $4.00 | $2.50 |
| Shares Outstanding | 50M | 80M |
| Market Cap | $3,200M | $3,040M |
| Debt | $1,800M | $400M |
| Cash | $200M | $150M |
| EV | $4,800M | $3,290M |
| EBITDA | $480M | $380M |
- Ashwood P/E = 64/4.00 = 16.0x
- Birchfield P/E = 38/2.50 = 15.2x
- Ashwood EV/EBITDA = 4,800/480 = 10.0x
- Birchfield EV/EBITDA = 3,290/380 = 8.7x
On P/E, the companies look similar. But EV/EBITDA reveals Ashwood trades at a meaningful premium. The difference? Ashwood has much more debt, which reduces EPS through interest expense, making P/E misleadingly comparable.
Common Pitfalls:
- Comparing P/E across different leverage levels — distorts comparison
- Using trailing P/E for cyclical companies — earnings at peak inflate P/E at trough
- Ignoring adjustments — one-time items, stock compensation, lease differences
- EV/EBITDA ignoring capex — high capex companies may be overvalued on EV/EBITDA
Exam Tip: If the question mentions companies with different capital structures or D&A policies, EV/EBITDA is the right choice. If both are mature, stable, low-leverage businesses, P/E works fine.
Practice relative valuation analysis with our CFA Level II question bank on AcadiFi.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.