How does a pension plan curtailment affect the projected benefit obligation (PBO) and the income statement?
I came across a CFA Level II question where a company significantly reduced the number of employees covered by its defined benefit plan. The answer mentioned a 'curtailment' that reduced the PBO and created a gain. How exactly does curtailment accounting work?
A pension curtailment occurs when an employer significantly reduces the expected years of future service of current employees (e.g., through mass layoffs) or eliminates the accrual of benefits for a significant number of employees for all or some of their future services (e.g., freezing the pension plan).
Effect on PBO:
A curtailment generally reduces the PBO because fewer (or no) future benefits will accrue. The reduction creates a curtailment gain (or sometimes a loss if termination benefits are enhanced).
Accounting Treatment (IAS 19 / ASC 715):
Under IAS 19 (revised), curtailment gains and losses are recognized immediately in profit or loss in the period the curtailment occurs.
Under ASC 715 (US GAAP), the treatment is similar — curtailment gains/losses are recognized when the curtailment event occurs and the effects are estimable.
Components of a Curtailment Gain/Loss:
- Change in PBO — the reduction in the present value of future benefits
- Recognition of unrecognized items — any prior service cost (from plan amendments) related to the curtailed benefits must be immediately recognized in P&L
Worked Example — Sterling Industries:
Sterling announces it will freeze its defined benefit plan, eliminating all future benefit accruals for its 1,200 participants.
| Item | Before Curtailment | After Curtailment | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBO | $185,000,000 | $152,000,000 | ($33,000,000) |
| Plan assets | $140,000,000 | $140,000,000 | $0 |
| Funded status | ($45,000,000) | ($12,000,000) | +$33,000,000 |
Additionally, Sterling has $8,000,000 of unrecognized prior service cost in AOCI related to a 2023 plan amendment.
Curtailment Gain Calculation:
- Reduction in PBO: $33,000,000 (gain)
- Less: Immediate recognition of prior service cost: ($8,000,000) (loss)
- Net curtailment gain: $25,000,000
Journal Entry:
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| PBO | $33,000,000 | |
| AOCI — Prior Service Cost | $8,000,000 | |
| Curtailment Gain (P&L) | $25,000,000 |
Analytical Implications:
- One-time gain — the $25M gain significantly boosts reported income but is non-recurring. Analysts typically exclude it from normalized earnings.
- Improved funded status — the funded status improves by $33M, reducing the net pension liability on the balance sheet.
- Future pension expense drops — with no future accruals, service cost goes to zero. The only remaining pension cost is interest on the existing PBO minus expected return on plan assets.
- Strategic motivation — companies sometimes curtail plans specifically to reduce balance sheet liabilities and boost short-term earnings.
Key Exam Points:
- Curtailment gains/losses are recognized immediately in P&L.
- Unrecognized prior service cost related to curtailed benefits must also be immediately recognized.
- Curtailment vs. settlement: curtailment reduces future benefit accruals; settlement eliminates the obligation entirely (e.g., lump-sum payouts).
- The PBO reduction from curtailment is separate from any actuarial gains/losses.
Practice more pension scenarios in our CFA Level II question bank.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.