What is a rainbow option, and how does the correlation between underlying assets affect its pricing?
I'm studying multi-asset exotics for FRM and ran into rainbow options. The best-of option pays off on whichever asset performs the best. Intuitively, lower correlation should make this more valuable since the assets spread out more — but I want to understand the exact mechanics and pricing implications.
A rainbow option is a multi-asset derivative whose payoff depends on the relative performance of two or more underlying assets. The 'best-of' variant pays based on the highest-performing asset, while 'worst-of' uses the lowest performer.\n\nBest-of Call Payoff (2 assets):\n\nPayoff = max(max(S1_T, S2_T) - K, 0)\n\nThe holder benefits from whichever asset finishes higher, then applies the strike.\n\n`mermaid\ngraph TD\n A[\"Rainbow Option
2 Assets: S1, S2\"] --> B{\"At Expiration\"}\n B --> C[\"S1_T = $115
S2_T = $108\"]\n B --> D[\"S1_T = $92
S2_T = $103\"]\n B --> E[\"S1_T = $88
S2_T = $91\"]\n C --> F[\"Best-of: $115
Payoff: max(115-100,0) = $15\"]\n D --> G[\"Best-of: $103
Payoff: max(103-100,0) = $3\"]\n E --> H[\"Best-of: $91
Payoff: max(91-100,0) = $0\"]\n F --> I[\"Worst-of: $108
Payoff: max(108-100,0) = $8\"]\n D --> J[\"Worst-of: $92
Payoff: max(92-100,0) = $0\"]\n E --> K[\"Worst-of: $88
Payoff: max(88-100,0) = $0\"]\n`\n\nCorrelation Impact:\n\n| Correlation (rho) | Best-of Value | Worst-of Value |\n|---|---|---|\n| +1.0 | Equals vanilla on either | Equals vanilla on either |\n| +0.5 | Higher than vanilla | Lower than vanilla |\n| 0.0 | Significantly higher | Significantly lower |\n| -0.5 | Much higher | Near zero |\n| -1.0 | Maximum possible | Approaches zero |\n\nWhen correlation is +1, both assets move identically, so the best-of option collapses to a single-asset option. As correlation decreases, the spread between asset paths widens, increasing the probability that at least one asset performs well.\n\nWorked Example:\nNorthbridge Capital buys a 1-year best-of call on Elysium Energy and Cobalt Mining shares, both starting at $50, strike $50.\n\n- Elysium volatility: 35%\n- Cobalt volatility: 40%\n- Correlation: 0.3\n- Risk-free rate: 4%\n\nUsing the Stulz (1982) two-asset pricing model:\n- Vanilla call on Elysium alone: $8.12\n- Vanilla call on Cobalt alone: $9.25\n- Best-of call: $12.80 (premium over the better single-asset option)\n- Worst-of call: $4.57 (discount to the cheaper single-asset option)\n\nNote: Best-of + Worst-of = Call_on_S1 + Call_on_S2 (Margrabe-type decomposition)\nCheck: $12.80 + $4.57 = $17.37 versus $8.12 + $9.25 = $17.37\n\nApplications:\n- Outperformance strategies in asset management\n- Structured products linked to baskets of indices\n- Executive compensation tied to relative stock performance\n\nPractice multi-asset derivative problems in our FRM question bank.
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.