When should I use forward P/E versus trailing P/E in comparable analysis?
For CFA Level II relative valuation, I'm always second-guessing whether to use trailing or forward earnings in the P/E multiple. My study group argues about this constantly. What are the rules of thumb, and how do analysts in practice decide?
The choice between forward and trailing P/E depends on what you are trying to capture and the quality of available data.
Definitions:
- Trailing P/E = Price / Earnings per share over the last 12 months (LTM)
- Forward P/E = Price / Consensus forecast EPS for the next 12 months (NTM)
Key Differences:
| Feature | Trailing P/E | Forward P/E |
|---|---|---|
| Data source | Actual reported earnings | Analyst estimates |
| Reliability | Objective (audited) | Subjective (forecast) |
| Timeliness | Backward-looking | Forward-looking |
| Growth capture | Misses future changes | Reflects expected trends |
| Availability | Always available | Requires analyst coverage |
When to Use Forward P/E (Generally Preferred):
- Valuation is forward-looking by nature. You buy a stock for future earnings, not past ones. A company trading at 30x trailing but 18x forward may be fairly valued if earnings are accelerating.
- Significant earnings change expected. If Oakfield Semiconductor (fictional) earned $2.00 LTM but consensus expects $3.50 NTM due to a product launch:
- Trailing P/E at $70 = 35.0x (looks expensive)
- Forward P/E at $70 = 20.0x (more reasonable)
- Industry standard. Most sell-side equity research uses forward P/E as the primary metric.
- Comparable analysis. When comparing peers, forward P/E normalizes for different fiscal year-ends and one-time charges in historical periods.
When to Use Trailing P/E:
- No analyst coverage — small caps, micro caps, and some international stocks lack consensus estimates
- Forecasts are unreliable — high forecast dispersion, turnarounds, or companies with volatile earnings make forward estimates questionable
- Screening and historical comparisons — trailing P/E is useful for quantitative screens because it is objective and consistently calculated
- Cyclical peak/trough detection — comparing trailing P/E to historical average trailing P/E helps identify where we are in the cycle
Practical Illustration:
Comparing three media companies at the same price ($50/share):
| Company | Trailing EPS | Forward EPS | Trailing P/E | Forward P/E |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belmont Media | $3.00 | $3.80 | 16.7x | 13.2x |
| Hargrove Studios | $4.50 | $4.20 | 11.1x | 11.9x |
| Ridgeway Digital | $2.00 | $4.00 | 25.0x | 12.5x |
Using trailing P/E, Hargrove looks cheapest. But Hargrove's forward EPS is declining (margin pressure?), while Ridgeway is doubling. On forward P/E, Ridgeway is actually the cheapest.
Academic evidence: Research shows that forward P/E has better predictive power for future stock returns than trailing P/E, because it incorporates the most current information about earnings trajectory.
Exam tip: CFA Level II vignettes will often provide both trailing and forward data. If the question asks which metric is more appropriate for the given scenario, look for clues: anticipated earnings changes, one-time items in LTM earnings, or lack of analyst coverage.
Practice relative valuation in our CFA Level II question bank.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.