How does the repo market work, and why are haircuts so important for managing counterparty risk?
I'm studying money markets for FRM Part I and repos seem fundamental but I don't fully understand the mechanics. Why would someone 'sell' a security they want to keep? And how do haircuts protect the cash lender?
A repurchase agreement (repo) is economically a short-term collateralized loan, but legally structured as a sale-and-repurchase. The borrower 'sells' securities today and agrees to 'buy' them back at a slightly higher price.
Basic Mechanics:
Day 1 (repo open):
- Thornfield Asset Management needs $100M overnight
- Thornfield 'sells' $102M face value of Treasury bonds to Clearview Capital
- Clearview pays $100M cash
Day 2 (repo close):
- Thornfield repurchases the bonds for $100,013,889 ($100M + one day of interest at 5%)
- Repo rate = 5.0% annualized
Why Sell Something You Want to Keep?
The 'sale' structure provides crucial legal protection. If Thornfield goes bankrupt, Clearview already owns the securities — they're not stuck in bankruptcy proceedings trying to seize collateral. This is why repos have lower counterparty risk than unsecured lending.
Haircuts:
The haircut is the difference between the collateral's market value and the loan amount:
Haircut = (Collateral Value - Loan Amount) / Collateral Value
In our example: ($102M - $100M) / $102M = 1.96%
The haircut protects the cash lender against:
- Market risk: If the collateral drops in value before the repo closes
- Liquidation cost: Bid-ask spreads and time to sell in stressed markets
- Credit risk: Haircuts are higher for riskier collateral
| Collateral Type | Typical Haircut |
|---|---|
| US Treasuries | 1-2% |
| Agency MBS | 2-5% |
| Investment-grade corporates | 5-10% |
| Equities | 10-25% |
| Structured products (ABS/CDO) | 15-40% |
FRM-Critical Concepts:
- Margin calls: If collateral drops below a threshold, the borrower must post additional securities or cash
- Rehypothecation: The cash lender can re-use the collateral in their own repo, creating chains of leverage
- Fire-sale risk: In a crisis, rising haircuts force leveraged firms to sell assets, depressing prices further (procyclical)
- Triparty repo: A clearing bank holds the collateral and manages margin, reducing operational risk
During the 2008 crisis, haircuts on structured products spiked from 10% to 40%+, triggering forced selling and liquidity spirals. Understanding this procyclicality is essential for FRM.
Practice repo calculations in our FRM Part I question bank.
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.