How are risk-weighted assets calculated under the Internal Ratings-Based approach?
I'm working through Basel capital requirements for FRM Part II. The IRB approach lets banks use their own estimates of PD, LGD, and EAD, but I'm confused about the actual RWA formula. There's a correlation function and a maturity adjustment that seem complex. Can someone walk through the calculation step by step?
The IRB (Internal Ratings-Based) approach allows banks to use their own risk parameters to compute capital requirements, subject to regulatory formulas. The key formula converts PD, LGD, EAD, and maturity into a capital charge, which then maps to risk-weighted assets.
The IRB Capital Formula (Corporate Exposures)
Capital Requirement (K) = LGD x [N((1/(1-R))^0.5 x G(PD) + (R/(1-R))^0.5 x G(0.999)) − PD] x MA
Where:
- N() = Standard normal CDF
- G() = Inverse standard normal
- R = Asset correlation
- MA = Maturity adjustment
Step-by-Step Calculation
Suppose Alderton International Bank rates a corporate borrower with:
- PD = 1.5%
- LGD = 40%
- EAD = $50 million
- Maturity = 3 years
Step 1: Asset Correlation (R)
R = 0.12 x [(1 − e^(−50xPD))/(1 − e^(−50))] + 0.24 x [1 − (1 − e^(−50xPD))/(1 − e^(−50))]
R = 0.12 x [(1 − e^(−0.75))/(1 − e^(−50))] + 0.24 x [1 − ...]
With PD = 0.015:
(1 − e^(−0.75)) = 0.5276
R = 0.12 x 0.5276 + 0.24 x (1 − 0.5276) = 0.0633 + 0.1135 = 0.1768
Step 2: Conditional PD at 99.9% Confidence
Conditional PD = N((1/(1−0.1768))^0.5 x G(0.015) + (0.1768/(1−0.1768))^0.5 x G(0.999))
= N(1.1027 x (−2.1701) + 0.4635 x 3.0902)
= N(−2.3930 + 1.4333)
= N(−0.9597) = 0.1687 or 16.87%
Step 3: Base Capital Charge
K_base = LGD x (Conditional PD − PD) = 0.40 x (0.1687 − 0.015) = 0.40 x 0.1537 = 6.15%
Step 4: Maturity Adjustment
b = [0.11852 − 0.05478 x ln(PD)]^2 = [0.11852 − 0.05478 x (−4.1997)]^2 = [0.3485]^2 = 0.1215
MA = (1 + (M − 2.5) x b) / (1 − 1.5 x b) = (1 + 0.5 x 0.1215) / (1 − 0.1822) = 1.0607 / 0.8178 = 1.297
Step 5: Final Capital Requirement
K = 6.15% x 1.297 = 7.98%
Step 6: Risk-Weighted Assets
RWA = K x 12.5 x EAD = 0.0798 x 12.5 x $50M = $49.9 million
Capital required = 8% x RWA = 8% x $49.9M = $3.99 million
Key Insights:
- Higher PD leads to higher conditional PD and more capital
- Longer maturity increases capital through the maturity adjustment
- The 0.999 quantile reflects Basel's 99.9% confidence level — capital covers losses in a 1-in-1000 year event
- Asset correlation R decreases with PD: riskier borrowers are assumed to be more idiosyncratic
Exam Tip: You won't need to memorize the full formula, but understand the intuition: the IRB approach models portfolio credit risk as a single systematic factor (the Vasicek model), and the correlation parameter R determines how much each borrower's default is driven by the common factor vs. idiosyncratic risk.
For more Basel capital problems, try our FRM Part II question bank.
Master Part II with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.