When is single-factor sensitivity analysis sufficient versus when do you need a full multi-factor stress test?
I'm reviewing stress testing approaches for the FRM exam. The curriculum mentions single-factor sensitivity analysis as a starting point, but it's unclear when this approach is actually adequate for risk management decisions. My employer, a regional bank, currently only runs single-factor shocks on interest rates. Should we be doing more?
Unlock with Scholar — $19/month
Get full access to all Q&A answers, practice question explanations, and progress tracking.
No credit card required for free trial
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.