What does Standard V require for investment analysis? How do I demonstrate 'reasonable basis'?
CFA Level I Standard V is about investment analysis and recommendations. I understand I need diligence, but what exactly constitutes a 'reasonable basis' for a recommendation? And how do I handle when I disagree with my firm's research?
Standard V ensures that investment recommendations are well-founded and clearly communicated.
Standard V(A) — Diligence and Reasonable Basis:
You must exercise diligence, independence, and thoroughness when making investment recommendations. A recommendation must be supported by appropriate research.
What constitutes a reasonable basis:
- Thorough analysis of the company's financial statements
- Understanding of the industry and competitive environment
- Consideration of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors
- Use of appropriate valuation models
- Assessment of the quality and reliability of data sources
Using third-party research:
You CAN rely on third-party research (sell-side reports, external models) BUT you must:
- Evaluate the methodology and assumptions
- Understand the research well enough to defend it
- Not blindly pass through recommendations without review
Standard V(B) — Communication with Clients:
Disclose the basic format and principles of the investment process. Specifically:
- Distinguish between fact and opinion in your analysis
- Identify important factors and limitations
- Disclose changes in methodology or risk models
Standard V(C) — Record Retention:
Maintain records supporting your analysis and recommendations. The CFA Institute recommends keeping records for at least 7 years (though local laws may require more or less).
Practical Example:
Amira, an analyst at Pine Harbor Capital, recommends buying Osprey Dynamics stock based solely on a tip from a friend who works in the industry. She has not reviewed financial statements, built a model, or examined competitive positioning. This violates Standard V(A) — she lacks a reasonable basis.
Corrected approach:
Amira should: (1) analyze Osprey's financials, (2) build or review a valuation model, (3) assess the industry outlook, (4) document her analysis, and then make a recommendation supported by evidence.
When you disagree with your firm:
If your firm issues a recommendation you believe lacks reasonable basis:
- Express your concerns through proper internal channels
- If the firm proceeds, you may need to dissociate (request your name be removed from the report)
- You are NOT required to resign, but you cannot put your name on analysis you believe is unsupported
Exam tip: Standard V questions often test whether the analyst did enough research before making a recommendation. Look for shortcuts in the analysis process — that's usually the violation.
Practice Standard V scenarios in our CFA Level I question bank.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.