How do conversion factors work in Treasury bond futures, and why does the cheapest-to-deliver bond matter so much?
I'm studying FRM Part I and keep getting tripped up by Treasury bond futures. The contract specs say it delivers 'any bond with 15+ years to maturity,' but how does the exchange standardize the price across all these different bonds? And why does everyone keep talking about the 'cheapest to deliver'?
Treasury bond futures are unique because the short side can deliver any eligible bond (maturity 15+ years) against the contract. Since bonds have different coupons and maturities, the exchange uses conversion factors (CF) to normalize them.
Conversion Factor Mechanics:
The CF is the price at which a bond would trade if its YTM were exactly 6% (the contract's notional coupon). High-coupon bonds get CFs above 1.0; low-coupon bonds get CFs below 1.0.
The invoice price paid to the short is:
Invoice Price = (Futures Price x CF) + Accrued Interest
Why Cheapest-to-Deliver (CTD) Matters:
The short wants to minimize their cost, so they compare what they receive (invoice price) versus what each bond costs in the cash market. The CTD is the bond that maximizes:
Delivery Profit = Invoice Price - Cash Market Price
Or equivalently minimizes the basis = Cash Price - (Futures Price x CF).
Example:
Suppose the futures price is 120-00 (i.e., $120,000 per contract) and two eligible bonds exist:
| Bond | Cash Price | CF | Invoice Received | Delivery Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ridgemont 4.25% 2044 | $98.50 | 0.8120 | $97.44 | -$1.06 |
| Harborline 5.75% 2046 | $112.80 | 0.9450 | $113.40 | +$0.60 |
Harborline is the CTD because it yields the highest delivery profit.
CTD Behavior Rules:
- When yields > 6%: Low-coupon, long-duration bonds become CTD
- When yields < 6%: High-coupon, short-duration bonds become CTD
- CTD shifts can cause sudden basis changes, creating risk for hedgers
The futures price effectively tracks the CTD bond, so understanding which bond is CTD tells you how the contract will behave when rates move. This is heavily tested on the FRM exam.
For more depth on fixed-income derivatives, explore our FRM course materials.
Master Part I with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.