When is paid research still considered public information?
I keep mixing up expensive information with nonpublic information. If a research platform charges a large subscription fee but any institutional investor can buy access, can I still treat that research as public for CFA ethics purposes?
Yes, it can still be public if it is broadly available on equal and legitimate terms. The fact that a data feed is expensive does not automatically make it nonpublic.
Think about Blue Mesa Analytics, a subscription platform that sells shipping and inventory dashboards to any buy-side or sell-side firm willing to pay the posted fee. Analyst Priya Shah subscribes, sees demand strengthening for Cobalt Home Goods, and upgrades the stock. That is not automatically a Standard II(A) problem because the information channel is open to the market on fair terms.
The cleaner test is:
- Was access legitimate?
- Could other market participants obtain it through the same normal channel?
- Would a reasonable investor care about the information?
That last point matters because information can be both public and material at the same time.
Do not use price tag as a substitute for the public-versus-nonpublic analysis.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.